Unify `Get` and `Paths` / `PickDeep` etc

[voxpelli]

Its a bit odd that we have Get which accepts three styles of specifying paths, but doesn't use Paths, and also have PickDeep etc which use Paths and only accepts a single style of specifying paths.

• Paths is used to validate that the specified paths are valid options + used to give intellisense, both which are handy.
• Paths only supports the foo.0.bar style of paths whereas Get also supports foo[0].bar and ['foo', '0', 'bar'], is that maybe overkill for Get? Or, if useful, should Paths etc be extended with the same functionality?

Desired outcome:

Ideally Get and Paths / PickDeep etc should behave the same when it comes to paths and use the same fundamentals.

Random notes

PickDeep and Get feels fairly similar in other ways as well – maybe one could adapt the internals of PickDeep to also serve Get?

I gave it a look and a try but got a headache and needs to bang my head against something right now.

Upvote & Fund

• We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
• The funding will be given to active contributors.
• Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.

[voxpelli]

Something to keep in mind if one unifies is that ., [, ] are all valid property names of an object, which breaks the text based paths: https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest/issues/864

(Also: Symbols are valid properties as well but can't be expressed in any of the two current paths implementations)