search

single-cell-data / TileDB-SOMA

Python and R SOMA APIs using TileDB’s cloud-native format. Ideal for single-cell data at any scale.
https://tiledbsoma.readthedocs.io
MIT License
90 stars 25 forks source link

Use core 2.26.0 #2976

Closed johnkerl closed 1 month ago

johnkerl commented 1 month ago

[sc-53002]

Uses:

Following our established procedure

The core-arifact URLs were updated as always following our procedure via the one-line, error-proof

./scripts/update-tiledb-version.py 2.26.0
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 89.99%. Comparing base (515563f) to head (b7b1216). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2976 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 89.84% 89.99% +0.14% ========================================== Files 39 39 Lines 4057 4057 ========================================== + Hits 3645 3651 +6 + Misses 412 406 -6 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/single-cell-data/TileDB-SOMA/pull/2976/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=single-cell-data) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/single-cell-data/TileDB-SOMA/pull/2976/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=single-cell-data) | `89.99% <ø> (+0.14%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=single-cell-data#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Components](https://app.codecov.io/gh/single-cell-data/TileDB-SOMA/pull/2976/components?src=pr&el=components&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=single-cell-data) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python_api](https://app.codecov.io/gh/single-cell-data/TileDB-SOMA/pull/2976/components?src=pr&el=component&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=single-cell-data) | `89.99% <ø> (+0.14%)` | :arrow_up: | | [libtiledbsoma](https://app.codecov.io/gh/single-cell-data/TileDB-SOMA/pull/2976/components?src=pr&el=component&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=single-cell-data) | `∅ <ø> (∅)` | |
johnkerl commented 1 month ago

@nguyenv @eddelbuettel this has a temporary lack-of-pin on tiledb-py -- which is currently ok since we only use typedb-py for unit-testing now -- and there are no storage-format changes in core 2.26.

Let's go ahead & move forward with this for this morning, and I'll update the tiledb-py pin once https://github.com/pypi/support/issues/4744 after which point @dudoslav will be able to publish all PyPI artifacts for tiledb-py 0.32.0.