I was thinking about this as well. However, if we are talking about SNet services, then superresolution is simply a stand-alone service. We don't need to integrate in metafusion (unless we are talking about stable diffusion upscaling, which results are not too good). OTOH, if we consider metafusion as a stand-alone library for image generation, then upscaling is essential, and I always use it by myself. But I'm doing it independently from image generation pipelines. It is really a separate operation. However, there are advanced scenarios of video generation, in which superresolution can be inside the generation pipeline... Thus, it still may make sense to have such functionality inside the library, but I'd say moving it into the library can be postponed until we decide to introduce such advanced generation scenarios.
I was thinking about this as well. However, if we are talking about SNet services, then superresolution is simply a stand-alone service. We don't need to integrate in metafusion (unless we are talking about stable diffusion upscaling, which results are not too good). OTOH, if we consider metafusion as a stand-alone library for image generation, then upscaling is essential, and I always use it by myself. But I'm doing it independently from image generation pipelines. It is really a separate operation. However, there are advanced scenarios of video generation, in which superresolution can be inside the generation pipeline... Thus, it still may make sense to have such functionality inside the library, but I'd say moving it into the library can be postponed until we decide to introduce such advanced generation scenarios.