Closed deborahduong closed 5 years ago
In debugging how this simulation has a non-responsive Reputation System, I ran the simulation of https://github.com/singnet/reputation/blob/master/reputation/reputation_scenario_test.py , with transactions for good and bad of 10 and 10, to reproduce Antons spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HbAjXZzj6E1meXyxPLS8f62LbhLRIv3lCwpSLgACt8I/edit#gid=2064997300), on his port 1288. I ran it again, with the same RNG seed, and had the exact same numbers , the ones on the spreadsheet. Next I changed only one line, running it on port 1187, with the Aigents installed there yesterday, and the Reputation System was non-responsive for burn aware runs. Enclosed are the run from Antons port, and the run from my port.
antonRNG1_1187.txt antonRNG1.txt
reputation_scenario_test.dd.txt
In debugging how this simulation has a non-responsive Reputation System, I ran the simulation of https://github.com/singnet/reputation/blob/master/reputation/reputation_scenario_test.py , with transactions for good and bad of 10 and 10, to reproduce Antons spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HbAjXZzj6E1meXyxPLS8f62LbhLRIv3lCwpSLgACt8I/edit#gid=2064997300), on his port 1288. I ran it again, with the same RNG seed, and had the exact same numbers , the ones on the spreadsheet. Next I changed only one line, running it on port 1187, with the Aigents installed there yesterday, and the Reputation System was non-responsive for burn aware runs. Enclosed are the run from Antons port, and the run from my port.