Closed rouille closed 8 months ago
Thanks, Ben! Looks like there's a lot of ESCs that are getting added or removed, but most of these have zero gen and fuel consumption. I think at this point we only care about whether there is a fuel missing in one dataset that has a non-zero allocation in another dataset, so for example in the first output dataframe, we'd want to print 58256 MWH and 59825 WND but not any of the other ones that are all zeros. Are all of the non-zero mismatches from your first two tables reflected in the bottom three? It appears that at least 58256 and 59285 are. If so, maybe we just keep the original three bottom dataframe outputs and not print the top two if they repeat the same information?
Yes, all non-zero mismatches in the first two tables are listed in the bottom 3 tables. More specifically, there are only 3 non-zero (either generation or fuel consumed or both) entries in the first table (the two you quoted + 59825 that was truncated), all entries in the second table are zero. The other 4 entries in the last 3 tables have the same (plant_eia_id
, energy_source_code
) but different value for generation, fuel consumed or both).
I will not print the first two tables but if you agree I will quote the number of non-zero entries vs zero entries for both tables.
I will not print the first two tables but if you agree I will quote the number of non-zero entries vs zero entries for both tables.
Sure, that sounds great to me
Closes https://github.com/singularity-energy/open-grid-emissions/issues/321
@rouille could you please also take a look at the plant mentioned in this issue (50900 in 2020) to see if this new warning catches anything here?
I will not print the first two tables but if you agree I will quote the number of non-zero entries vs zero entries for both tables.
Sure, that sounds great to me
Done. This is now the output we get:
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:79 There are 469 plant/fuel combinations that are either in EIA-923 Input or allocated EIA-923 but not in both
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:94 There are 60 plant/fuel combinations in EIA-923 Input but not in allocated EIA-923. There are 3 rows with non-zero or missing values
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:110 There are 409 plant/fuel combinations in allocated EIA-923 but not in EIA-923 Input. There are 0 rows with non-zero or missing values
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:130 There are 7 plant/fuel combinations with non-zero (missing) net generation or fuel consumed that are different in aloocated EIA-923 and EIA-923 Input
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:139 Percentage Difference:
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:140
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu ba_code
plant_id_eia energy_source_code
1316 NG 8.704314e-02 0.000000 0.000000 SWPP
10613 WDS 1.171735e-16 0.056065 0.558523 NBSO
54724 GEO -1.000000e+00 -1.000000 -1.000000 IID
58256 MWH -1.000000e+00 0.000000 0.000000 PNM
59817 SUN -1.000000e+00 -1.000000 -1.000000 PACE
59825 WND -1.000000e+00 -1.000000 -1.000000 CPLE
65498 WND -1.000000e+00 -1.000000 -1.000000 MISO
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:143 EIA-923 Input Totals:
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:144
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu ba_code
plant_id_eia energy_source_code
1316 NG 413.588 14274.0 14274.0 SWPP
10613 WDS 31047.793 913514.0 91699.0 NBSO
54724 GEO 98804.000 337120.0 337120.0 IID
58256 MWH -83.000 0.0 0.0 PNM
59817 SUN 98.000 336.0 336.0 PACE
59825 WND 9972.000 34024.0 34024.0 CPLE
65498 WND 1158.000 3950.0 3950.0 MISO
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:150 Allocated Totals:
2024-03-18 09:42:42 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:151
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu ba_code
plant_id_eia energy_source_code
1316 NG 449.588 14274.0 14274.0 SWPP
10613 WDS 31047.793 964730.0 142915.0 NBSO
54724 GEO 0.000 0.0 0.0 IID
58256 MWH NaN NaN NaN PNM
59817 SUN 0.000 0.0 0.0 PACE
59825 WND NaN NaN NaN CPLE
65498 WND NaN NaN NaN MISO
Closes #321
@rouille could you please also take a look at the plant mentioned in this issue (50900 in 2020) to see if this new warning catches anything here?
I ran the validation for 2020 and plant 50900 is not caught:
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:80 There are 375 plant/fuel combinations that are either in EIA-923 Input or allocated EIA-923 but not in both
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:95 There are 49 plant/fuel combinations in EIA-923 Input but not in allocated EIA-923. There are 3 rows with non-zero or missing values
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:111 There are 326 plant/fuel combinations in allocated EIA-923 but not in EIA-923 Input. There are 0 rows with non-zero or missing values
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:131 There are 6 plant/fuel combinations with non-zero (missing) net generation or fuel consumed that are different in aloocated EIA-923 and EIA-923 Input
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:140 Percentage Difference:
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:141
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu ba_code
plant_id_eia energy_source_code
1404 NG -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 MISO
50766 GEO -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 IID
54724 GEO -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 IID
58256 MWH -1.0 0.0 0.0 PNM
59395 NG -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 CISO
OBG -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 CISO
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:144 EIA-923 Input Totals:
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:145
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu ba_code
plant_id_eia energy_source_code
1404 NG 574.000 8107.0 8107.0 MISO
50766 GEO 98652.000 864881.0 864881.0 IID
54724 GEO 92218.000 808476.0 808476.0 IID
58256 MWH -651.000 0.0 0.0 PNM
59395 NG 15616.345 192675.0 192675.0 CISO
OBG 217.715 2687.0 2687.0 CISO
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:151 Allocated Totals:
2024-03-18 10:16:11 [WARNING] oge.oge.validation:152
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu ba_code
plant_id_eia energy_source_code
1404 NG 0.0 0.0 0.0 MISO
50766 GEO 0.0 0.0 0.0 IID
54724 GEO 0.0 0.0 0.0 IID
58256 MWH NaN NaN NaN PNM
59395 NG NaN NaN NaN CISO
OBG NaN NaN NaN CISO
If I look at plant 50900 before at after allocation, I don't see any difference: Before:
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu
energy_source_code
BIT 105215.258 3987865.0 1399645.0
BLQ 395340.884 15056080.0 5286858.0
DFO 74.779 3056.0 1006.0
NG 179337.462 6918596.0 2405170.0
RFO 2817.516 114434.0 38142.0
WDS 150504.101 5646554.0 2008289.0
After:
net_generation_mwh fuel_consumed_mmbtu fuel_consumed_for_electricity_mmbtu
energy_source_code
BIT 105215.258 3987865.0 1399645.0
BLQ 395340.884 15056080.0 5286858.0
DFO 74.779 3056.0 1006.0
NG 179337.462 6918596.0 2405170.0
RFO 2817.516 114434.0 38142.0
WDS 150504.101 5646554.0 2008289.0
If I look at plant 50900 before at after allocation, I don't see any difference:
Oh maybe this has already been fixed then and was an old issue
Purpose
Look for difference in the input and allocated EI-923 data at the plant/fuel level. This was previously done at the plant level only. Closes CAR-3506
What the code is doing
Group the input and allocated data frames by
plant_id_eia
andenergy_source_code
. Derive their symmetric difference in plant/fuel combination. It appears that among the 469 plant/fuel combinations that are in one of the data frames but not in both only 3 entries located in the input EIA-923 data frame have non-zero net generation and/or fuel consumed.Testing
Manually tested
Where to look
All the code is in the
check_allocated_gf_matches_input_gf
function of theoge.validation
moduleUsage Example/Visuals
Outputs (data frames have been truncated by hand for the PR):
Review estimate
10min
Future work
N/A
Checklist
black