Closed quytinh closed 11 years ago
Need to confirm with upstream (source site) first. :)
Yeah! :)
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, O P Pathak vri_admin@dhamma.net.in wrote: Dear Tinh Nguyen-ji, You have rightly pointed out the misplacements in Aªguttara Nik±ya, Ekakanip±tap±li of the paragraphs no.81 which should belong to Kaly±ºamitt±divaggo not to Appam±davaggo and paragraphs 130 to 139 should go to Adhammavaggo not to Dutiyapam±d±divaggo, from the context of subject. You can take them as mere misplacement of paragraphs or headings.
But the Chaµµhasaªg±yana Editions or the Burmese texts published have kept them as you have mentioned. VRI editions are based on Chaµµhasaªg±yana edition therefore we have kept as it is.
With Metta, O P Pathak
Note: Please reply only to vri_admin@dhamma.net.in
Vipassana Research Institute Dhamma Giri, Igatpuri, Nashik Maharashtra, Pin. 422 403, India
Tel: +91-2553-244076 / 244086 / 243712 / 243238 Ext. 205 Fax: +91-2553-244176
Email: vri_admin@dhamma.net.in Website: www.vridhamma.org www.dhamma.org
You can purchase VRI publications online (for India only). Please visit www.vridhamma.org From: Priti Dedhia [mailto:priti.dedhia@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 3:22 PM To: O P Pathak Subject: Fwd: Mistakes in Aṅguttaranikāya's copy
Respected Pathakji, Please check this on www.tipitaka.org and let me know whether correction is to be done or not. Metta Priti
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Quý Tính quytinh1601@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:30 PM Subject: Mistakes in Aṅguttaranikāya's copy To: help@tipitaka.org
Dear Sir/Madam,
I would appreciate your online Tipitaka Library. It helps many people to learn the Buddha's teaching directly via Pali Pitaka.
While reading the content. I found 2 abnormal points in the Aṅguttaranikāya and would be happy if you could explain me.
Please confirm me if the contents have been put on their right chapters or re-arrange it like my above recommendation once they were wrong arranged.
Thank you & best regards.
Tinh Nguyen Quy
Actually, it is a mistake of arrangement when they made the online version.
In Vietnamese Canon, those paragraphs are put in right chapters.
I sent an email about this mistakes to source site http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/ and waiting for their response.
I agree with Siong-Ui that we should ask people at the source site to fix the problem first, then we update our site.