Closed dgpv closed 5 years ago
I had doubts about adding dot for scalar multiplication, but I also noticed that there's potential ambiguity for sk
and ed
, and added the dot in ed
to bring attention to this issue.
I will remove the dot in e⋅d
in this PR - I think that it is better to use one-char names instead of sk
and pk
to avoid ambiguity vs scalar multiplication, but I do not have good candidate names for them.
ACK
Throughout the document, multiplication is denoted with dots, as in
d'⋅G
as opposed tod'G
. This is not the case in two places in the 'Default Signing' section.Missing dots are added for consistency.