Closed ElDuderinoBerlin closed 6 months ago
Hi,
is there a reason why you've broken the naming convention rule of naming async methods not Async?
It's a little bit confusion because you can miss an "await" when you not explicitly look at the return type.
Regards
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt + https://code.visualstudio.com/ = do it however you want
Hi,
is there a reason why you've broken the naming convention rule of naming async methods notAsync?
It's a little bit confusion because you can miss an "await" when you not explicitly look at the return type.
Regards