Closed stefanobortoli closed 8 years ago
Hi Stefano, could you send the configuration of your relations ? In particular the terms encoding parameter for each of your relation. Thanks.
This Kibi should be the Community Edition, so I think the terms encoding is fix to long.
It is the Enterprise version.
Ok, so go on Settings --> Relations and press on the grey pen for your relation
and copy here your config
attached all the screenshots I thought could be helpful
And if you click on the button (when it is count is equal to 1) to go to formalita, what is the result ? Is there one formalita document on the dashboard, or 0 ?
The filter says: "related to 2 from Veicoli", but the dashboard is empty.
what is the configuration of those buttons ?
In the next release, the relational filter visualization will have a spy panel, but for now the only way to get the queries behind it is through the dev inspector.
Can you check what is the query sent ? It is one which name contains button
so the easy way to get it is to type button
in the request filter (if you use chrome).
ok, about the the previous questions: when there is 1 on the button of the relational widget (filter by plate number) and I click on it, I have a dashboard formalita with 1 object with the relation of 1 vehicle. When I click on the button with count 0 (filter by vehicle id number), then I have the empty dashboard with the message of 2 vehicle.
if you need, we could share the whole bundle privately.
if possible that'd be nice
how can I send the bundle? it is around 250MB
You should receive an email. I have shared a folder with you on google drive
I was doing the same, already uploading. I will either share that or upload here tomorrow morning.
Thanks a lot for the support!
Il 28 set 2016 6:38 PM, "Nicola" notifications@github.com ha scritto:
You should receive an email. I have shared a folder with you on google drive
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sirensolutions/kibi/issues/59#issuecomment-250223334, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGIWAFDuniJe5d3aVVMvTADztUihXiUPks5qupfugaJpZM4KI0eZ .
guys this should be a ticket in the Customer Portal for the EE :)?
We can move it there. No problem. I have just shared the bundle with Nicola.
We restarted kibi, and for some obscure reasons the problems were solved. We keep it monitored to understand whether the problem appears again. Thanks a lot for the quick response and valid support received.
Hi @stefanobortoli, before seeing this issue, were you sending updates to the indices (e.g., adding or removing some documents) while Kibi was running ? (I am just wondering is this was not a caching issue somewhere).
I think so. Kibi was on while indexing the snipped of data used for the analysis.
If this happens again, could you try to run the command to clear the siren join cache:
$ curl -XGET 'http://localhost:9200/_filter_join/cache/clear
And then reload the kibi dashboard and see if the count changes as expected. If this is the case, please report this to us. Thanks.
I will certainly do. I guess the restart does the clear, right?
Restarting elasticsearch yes. But if you restarted only Kibi, then this means this is something on Kibi side, not siren join side. Did you restart Kibi or elasticsearch ?
We restarted everything, so we cannot help on this. However, we'll try to keep trace of these operations so that if we have troubles we can report.
Versions
Kibi: 4.5.3-4
Operating System:
Server Ubuntu 14.04-LTS, Browser Chrome 53.0.2785.116 m on Win 7 Pro
Behavior
Relational widget presents different numbers when applying sequential filters. In particular, the same object appears to have relations when filtered with a query on the top search box, and the same object did not have any relation when filtered using one of its properties.
Expected:
consistency in the relational widget up on different ways to filter the same object.
Actual:
the number of relations with other dashboard changes according the way we filter the same object.
Steps to reproduce the problem
attached the screencast: http://recordit.co/Nnm1dwlICE