sirkitree / angular-directive.g-signin

:triangular_ruler: AngularJS Directive for Google Plus Sign-in Button
http://jeradbitner.com/angular-directive.g-signin/
148 stars 84 forks source link

Verify Your Google API Project #67

Open sirkitree opened 6 years ago

sirkitree commented 6 years ago

I just received the following notice from Google:

Hello Developer of AngularJS Google Auth,You’re receiving this email because you’re listed as a contact on the Google Cloud Project that uses OAuth 2.0 to access Google APIs for your app: AngularJS Google Auth.In July, we announced new security protections to protect users from malicious and deceptive apps. As part of that effort, we need you to submit your app for verification. How? Submit the verification form https://support.google.com/code/contact/oauth_app_verification (Even partial submissions will help launch the review process.)By when? Prior to 2018-01-22Web client(s) that need verifying: 620125449078-4jo21sf1ltlb81o5cbke4sic3ogoo3gm.apps.googleusercontent.comIf you don’t submit the verification form by the deadline, your users will begin to see the “Unverified App” screen. If your app is only used by users within your domain and you have associated your project with a Cloud organization on the same domain, you do not need to file a verification request and your users will not see the “Unverified App” screen. Learn more.What is required to be verified by Google?Follow the steps listed on our FAQ under “How can I ensure the verification process is quick and smooth?”.Your app should use HTTPS for your redirect URIs and POST message origins.Your app must comply with Sign-In Branding Guidelines, changes that can double your conversion rate. More about this changeIf you think you received this email in error, update your app’s contact info in the Google developer console. You can learn more about this change in the Help Center article on Unverified Apps.

sirkitree commented 6 years ago

Not really sure how many people still use this, not a lot of watchers, it's old, but 91 forks says something I guess... In any case, if anyone is interested in helping update this, please let me know.