mattuntergassmair
commented
4 years ago Agreed, the current implementation was silently skipping the observe! function call and it was difficult for me to figure out I had not implemented that function for my specific types
I don't think we should provide a default for the
observe!method and let it throw a method error when it is not implemented for a custom model.https://github.com/sisl/AutomotiveDrivingModels.jl/blob/master/src/behaviors/interface.jl#L41
@mattuntergassmair