Open lacafjh opened 2 years ago
Can you elaborate why that would be useful? Why is the Internet Archive integration not sufficient? Should this be a configurable alternative to the Internet Archive integration, or should a bookmark be archived with multiple services?
Some websites cannot be successfully archived with Internet Archive Wayback Machine but can be archived with Archive Today. So I thought adding it as an option would make the bookmark service perfect (in case you run into a site that can't be archived).
I don't use IPFS very often, and IPFS is not as popular as Archive Today in my observations. I just thought if IPFS could be added as a supplement, the project will also attract people who prefer a more decentralized service.
Some websites cannot be successfully archived with Internet Archive Wayback Machine but can be archived with Archive Today. So I thought adding it as an option would make the bookmark service perfect (in case you run into a site that can't be archived).
Yeah. The Internet Archive currently respects the robots.txt file.
I'll add another (IMHO important and) current reason: cyberattacks + IAS outages
Thanks in advance + BR!
In terms of archiving, I think it might be useful to add support for Archive Today and IPFS to improve the reliability of network archiving? Just like rahiel/archiveror and wabarc/wayback does.