[system] 80 vs 160 MHz overclock

[siteswapjuggler]

I use to compile the code with the 160 Mhz option which seems to be not so smart because it overheat the µcontroller and could cause system errors (not confirmed with our system).

If the timing are still ok I'd suggest to go for 80 MHz instead of 160 MHz.

[siteswapjuggler]

As far as my test goes there is no proof of system errors caused by the 160 MHz option, no forum report of such problems either.

By the way timing tests tends to proof that 80 MHz doesn't give us enough processing power to perform the fusion algorythm while keeping the ticker timing ok.

So for now I'll decide to keep the 160 MHz option.