fix #44: override property definition on `gimme` call

[aparra]

Hello Jonathan, thanks for the pull request. I did the review of your code. Please refactor these points:

1) This code snippet is repeated in ObjectFactory class (old problem): Rule rule = templateHolder.getRules().get(label); if (rule == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.format(NO_SUCH_LABEL_MESSAGE, templateHolder.getClazz().getName(), label)); }

Please, refactor the snippet in a private method, this way you will avoid public method call public method in the same class: public T gimme(String label) { return gimme(label, new Rule()); } Call the gimme method without overwriting rules should not be a call gimme with empty rule, the key idea is create an object with the found rule. You will take a better gimme method with the creation (refactoring) of a private method to find the rule.

2) Probably, with the first refactoring this will not be necessary anymore. "Fica a dica :)". ObjectFactory#gimme has a reallocation: rule = new Rule(rule, propertiesToOverride); [line 73]. Refactor to ... this.createObject(new Rule(rule, propertiesToOverride)); Less is more.

3) import java.util.*; import a lot of classes, import only the necessary.

Let me know if I was clear.

[jonathanhds]

Hello Ander,

thanks for your feedback. This is my first time contributing for this project. I hope to help a lot from now on!

I've fixed the code according with your suggestions. I've also added the capacity to create a list of objects with a Rule to override the properties.

Let me know if this changes comply with the project's needs!

[aparra]

Ok. I'll close the pull request. I'm waiting the changes. Please create a new pull request. Thanks a lot.