Closed pyllyukko closed 1 year ago
I thought there might be something like this going on with this archive.
It's still ANSI and the year should be correct, so... :) Some clear remark about it not being a genuine ACiD should still be in order.
I would say it should be archived as indeed, it's still ansi :-)
Maybe we should create a new directory? Something like "misc", which could also be used to expand the archive? There could be a "misc/fake" directory for this pack ;)
We could also have a "misc/compos" and archive IRC compo packs, and so far and so on.
@fcambus @pyllyukko Been too long for this, but maybe change the file name to acdu0996-fake.zip
and modify/prefix the .diz file?
modify/prefix the .diz file?
Like how?
@pyllyukko extract the file_id.diz file, and prefix some info regarding it being a "fake" release. :-)
My question was more in the lines of "prefix with what?", and not about extracting/editing.
Are the file_id.diz files used somewhere? I kinda feel that modifying something inside the ZIP breaks the integrity of the pack. Being fake or not :)
Well I guess it's still there in the Git history, so it might not matter that much. Note added.
@lordscarlet @fcambus @ispyhumanfly
So, oddly enough, this is a fake acid pack. See this old interview:
So, do archive this? Do we change the filename? I'm not sure yet. Let's ping the others!
/cc @lordscarlet @fcambus