Closed sjanhunen closed 5 years ago
The intertestamental period: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intertestamental_period
Research on the terms OT and NT: https://standingonshoulders.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/where-did-the-term-old-testament-and-new-testament-come-from/
Goes back to the late second century. The concept was then imported into the English translations of the Bible.
How many of us recall right now (without consulting our Bibles) the last four books of the Old Testament?
How many of us remember what the last two verses of the Old Testament talk about? They look forward to Elijah and then the Last Days. (Mal 4:5-6). In chapter 3, Malachi looks forward to a "messenger" that will prepare the way before the Lord when He comes to visit the temple.
So, in Malachi, we see both the first coming and the second coming of the Lord just a few verses apart.
But how are we going to divide the Bible rightly?
Is it possible that we could somehow recenter our Bible around Christ, the theme and protagonist, to really figure out where this line goes?
Let's do a little experiment: assume for now that the Gospels are a just a continuation of where Malachi left off. If we start moving forward with that assumption, will we reach a natural point where we see the need to divide between Old and New?
We can ask the question: what is it that makes the Old Covenant "Old"?
Some initial observations on why the established division makes sense:
But where were the labels OT and NT actually used to divide up the books?