Closed rosslagerwall closed 10 years ago
Without this, loading both lusty-explorer and lusty-juggler took 55ms on my machine (see vim --startuptime), most likely due to loading the Ruby interpreter. With this, the combined loading time is less than 1ms.
Very cool. Thanks for doing this.
Without this, loading both lusty-explorer and lusty-juggler took 55ms on my machine (see vim --startuptime), most likely due to loading the Ruby interpreter. With this, the combined loading time is less than 1ms.