search

sjh37 / EntityFramework-Reverse-POCO-Code-First-Generator

EntityFramework Reverse POCO Code First Generator - Beautifully generated code that is fully customisable. This generator creates code as if you reverse engineered a database and lovingly created the code by hand. It is free to academics (you need a .edu or a .ac email address), not free for commercial use. Obtain your licence from
https://www.reversepoco.co.uk/
Other
700 stars 230 forks source link

EF.Reverse.POCO.v3.ttinclude different inside the distribution zip #808

Open clcdrn opened 1 year ago

clcdrn commented 1 year ago

Download https://github.com/sjh37/EntityFramework-Reverse-POCO-Code-First-Generator/archive/refs/tags/v3.8.4.zip

1) Shouldn't EntityFramework-Reverse-POCO-Code-First-Generator-3.8.4.zip\EntityFramework-Reverse-POCO-Code-First-Generator-3.8.4\EntityFramework.Reverse.POCO.Generator\EF.Reverse.POCO.v3.ttinclude be the same as EntityFramework-Reverse-POCO-Code-First-Generator-3.8.4.zip\EntityFramework-Reverse-POCO-Code-First-Generator-3.8.4\EntityFramework Reverse POCO Generator\ItemTemplates\efrpoco.zip\EF.Reverse.POCO.v3.ttinclude except for the CR+LF line endings?

2) Also, what about the EF6.ttinclude?

Maybe it doesn't matter, but the question is, which is correct?

sjh37 commented 1 year ago

Hi. The correct one is without EF6.ttinclude. I was going to include it but then Microsoft released a fix for it so no need for it.

clcdrn commented 1 year ago

What about the first question? Sorry, maybe I should have opened a separate ticket as the questions they are unrelated.

sjh37 commented 12 months ago

Yes they should be the same! Thanks for letting me know. I shall investigate. However it will be next week before I can look at it.