Network A

[olafm]

Hi Simon,

Debbie name a network just "A" and found that no policies were applied. I renamed the network to A42 an everything worked. Could that be a bug?

thanks,

olaf

[sk2]

Examples would help massively!

On 09/02/2012, at 10:33 AM, olafm reply@reply.github.com wrote:

Hi Simon,

Debbie name a network just "A" and found that no policies were applied. I renamed the network to A42 an everything worked. Could that be a bug?

thanks,

olaf

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/sk2/autonetkit/issues/232

[sk2]

I suspect it's the way I treat A# in the sets as meaning an ASN rather than a network name. But an example of the input in the bug would help me to replicate it, and to add a test case to prevent it in future. Cheers Simon

[olafm]

Hi Simon,

I think e-mail is better for this.

See attached the "star-broken.graphml"-file that Debbie created. This file doesn't create the policies correctly. Also attached the star.graphml, which fixes the problem. Star.policy is the policy file (of course in Debbie's file A42 was called just A).

Thanks a lot,

Olaf

On 09/02/2012 01:58, "Simon Knight" <reply+i-3150144-8def6098f627ee3925190470114d7210e60604c7-1309481@reply.git hub.com> wrote:

I suspect it's the way I treat A# in the sets as meaning an ASN rather than a network name. But an example of the input in the bug would help me to replicate it, and to add a test case to prevent it in future. Cheers Simon

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/sk2/autonetkit/issues/232#issuecomment-3880520

[sk2]

hmm, looks like GitHub doesn't support email attachments. Can you email them direct to me? thanks