search

skaersoe / Reactive

Reactive Reactor R&D
http://reactive.dk
1 stars 0 forks source link

Company purpose document (for Bent) #22

Open skaersoe opened 9 years ago

skaersoe commented 9 years ago

Purpose

At the meeting with Bent Lauritzen at Risø, we asked him to endorse us and potentially serve as advisor. His response was to at least give him some concrete material on our goals and how we want to pursue them. It makes a lot of sense to prepare such a document in general as it can communicate both to the outside world and between us, what we want to accomplish.

Structure

The document should outline the following:

trsch commented 9 years ago

Just read through the document with "track changes" on...

Askjensen commented 9 years ago

I've added a few comments - I suggest we make it completely clear that we want to do LFTR in he letter and use this to name specific advantages when it comes to costs, safety etc. I'm looking into some of the next areas....

trsch commented 9 years ago

@Askjensen: Just a comment: LFTR is a specific design, it insinuates a thorium closed fuel cycle in a FLiBe salt using thermal neutrons. We are doing MSR, which is a more general therm, however, i do think we agree that thorium is the way to go so we could also call it Th-MSR or just TMSR.

Askjensen commented 9 years ago

Ah yes of course I agree - still working on the lingo - but my point was to still clearly state that we want a molten salt reactor and the arguments that goes with that.

On 6 December 2014 at 22:41, Troels Schönfeldt notifications@github.com wrote:

@Ask https://github.com/Ask: Just a comment: LFTR is a specific design, it insinuates a thorium closed fuel cycle in a FLiBe salt using thermal neutrons. We are doing MSR, which is a more general therm, however, i do think we agree that thorium is the way to go so we could also call it Th-MSR or just TMSR.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/mdj/Reactive/issues/22#issuecomment-65915155.