[x] Mar 22, Mar 23: address comments and send back
For the draft up to page 109:
Block 1: 50 minutes:
[x] (5 minutes) 2.2 Luminosity and pileup
[x] (10 minutes) 2.4 CMS Detector
[x] (5 minutes) 2.5.2 ECAL: spacing before citations
[x] (10 minutes) 2.5.3 HCAL: check if we are using HO now, since it was not used in Run 1
[x] (10 minutes) 2.5.5 The Level-1 Trigger: "state that this pile-up was exceeded"
[x] (10 minutes) 2.5.5 The Level-1 Trigger: confirm years that the upgrades were finalized
[x] (5 minutes) Change \cite to ~\cite.
Block 2: 90 minutes:
[x] (20 minutes) 2.5.5 The Level-1 Trigger: "needs to include information about the Demux and Layer-2. You can keep the info about the legacy system and add in the information about the Phase-2 upgrade (? isn't this its own chapter)
[x] (5 minutes) 3.2 Phase-2 Level-1 Trigger: fix sentence in preamble + "what does this high-granularity mean for the barrel? include that here"
[x] (5 minutes) 3.3.2 Phase-2 e/g reconstruction algo: put figures closer to text where they are described (latex setting)
[x] (15 minutes) 3.3.2: explain what this "previous emulator" is
[x] (45 minutes, need help from Pallabi) "Write about the rates from the current menu version and the efficiencies. More text here about the performance in the Phase-2 Level-1 menu would be nice."
[x] (1 hour) (My own thought) Would be really nice to include the 2D distributions of the relative isolation vs. cluster pT and the et2x5/et5x5 vs. cluster pT. I think I have to remake these though. (Remade). Also could add a few additional validation plots but this feels like extra.
[x] (My own thought) Comment on how the correlator trigger and global trigger will use these.
Block 3: 70 minutes:
[x] (30 minutes) 4.1 Include tables of datasets.
[x] (10 minutes) 4.3 Embedded: "one from a set of d-muon trigger paths", move final paragraph to beginning of section
[x] (30 minutes) 4.3 Embedded: "Do you have any plots showing data/mc agreement for MC Z->tautau vs. Embedded? If not, you can steal some." Confirmed with advisor that it's OK to skip
Block 4: 50 minutes:
[x] (5 minutes) 5 Object reconstruction and corrections: change first sentence, change line 1088
[x] (10 minutes) 5.2 Reconstruction of di-tau mass: phrasing
[x] (5 minutes) 6 Event selection: other minor changes
[x] (10 minutes) 6 Event selection: include somewhere: "The two prong decay modes are only recommended for taus with a very high transverse momentum where one can expect the prongs to overlap."
[x] (10 minutes) 8 Systematic uncertainties: Add a sentence on what are systematic uncertainties and why we include them
Block 5: 45 minutes:
[x] (45 minutes) 8 Systematic uncertainties: Z pT reweighing, fake rate reweighing, yield uncertainties, luminosity normalization uncertainties"It would be better if these paragraphs included more information than a single sentence"
Block 6: 30 minutes:
[x] (30 minutes) 9.1 State increased stats from Run-1 and reference Run-1 analysis
Block 7: 60 minutes:
[x] (60 minutes) 9.2 Detail the DNN training, not necessary to reference the paper.
Send over: 30 minutes:
[x] (10 minutes) Check for any lone/ stub paragraphs.
For the draft up to page 109:
Block 1: 50 minutes:
\cite
to~\cite
.Block 2: 90 minutes:
(My own thought) Would be really nice to include the 2D distributions of the relative isolation vs. cluster pT and the et2x5/et5x5 vs. cluster pT. I think I have to remake these though. (Remade). Also could add a few additional validation plots but this feels like extra.Block 3: 70 minutes:
(30 minutes) 4.3 Embedded: "Do you have any plots showing data/mc agreement for MC Z->tautau vs. Embedded? If not, you can steal some."Confirmed with advisor that it's OK to skipBlock 4: 50 minutes:
Block 5: 45 minutes:
Block 6: 30 minutes:
Block 7: 60 minutes:
Send over: 30 minutes: