Closed ralphbean closed 1 month ago
+1. PyPi's entry is very bare. Just searching on PyPi leads to (https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=search&term=longerusername&submit=search): "Description: UNKNOWN". Please fix.
This pull request would also have helped in the packaging for Debian as the lack of any copyright declarations in the .py files, together with the lack of the LICENSE file in the tarball available from pypi makes it undistributable as-is. (In the absence of a statement of the BSD license in the released tarball, the tarball can be interpreted as proprietary.) I've added the LICENSE file to the packaging manually but it would be much better for 0.5 to include the LICENSE file in the MANIFEST.in file so that the pypi (and Debian) information is generated from a file included in the source package.
The PyPI entry is missing a bunch of information.
If you include this stuff, it should be much better in the next release. Thanks!