Closed nichtich closed 10 months ago
Indeed. I'm currently working on adding all the valid and invalid examples from the SKOS Reference and adjusting the shape respectivley in branch https://github.com/skohub-io/shapes/tree/constraint-property-groups.
So that would result in
After that we can proceed on the other shapes.
@nichtich I found this document from qSKOS regarding quality issues: https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/wiki/Quality-Issues#Ambiguous_Notation_References
Are you aware of any other best practice recommendation regarding SKOS?
Otherwise I would maybe go with this for implementing a best-practice shape
CC @acka47 @osma @wetneb
@nichtich And what do you mean with "analysis rules"?
This issue can better closed in favour of invidual issues for SKOS core rules, qSKOS rules, etc.
good point. Closing this in favour of #9
Anyone wanting to discuss other rules and shapes, feel free to open an issue.
The shapes file should better be split into e.g.