Split skos.shacl.ttl

[nichtich]

The shapes file should better be split into e.g.

• [x] core SKOS integrity rules (see #3)
• [ ] SKOS-XL rules
• [ ] best practice (warning severity)
• [ ] analysis rules (information severity)
• [ ] additional rules from Skohub
• [ ] additional rules from coli-conc/JSKOS
• [ ] XKOS rules

[sroertgen]

Indeed. I'm currently working on adding all the valid and invalid examples from the SKOS Reference and adjusting the shape respectivley in branch https://github.com/skohub-io/shapes/tree/constraint-property-groups.

So that would result in

• [x] core SKOS integrity rules (see https://github.com/skohub-io/shapes/issues/3)

After that we can proceed on the other shapes.

[sroertgen]

@nichtich I found this document from qSKOS regarding quality issues: https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/wiki/Quality-Issues#Ambiguous_Notation_References

Are you aware of any other best practice recommendation regarding SKOS?

Otherwise I would maybe go with this for implementing a best-practice shape

CC @acka47 @osma @wetneb

[sroertgen]

@nichtich And what do you mean with "analysis rules"?

[nichtich]

This issue can better closed in favour of invidual issues for SKOS core rules, qSKOS rules, etc.

[sroertgen]

good point. Closing this in favour of #9

Anyone wanting to discuss other rules and shapes, feel free to open an issue.