255 in scheme array

[sroertgen]

This will resolve #254 and #255

Now it is possible to have either one concept scheme in two files or two concept schemes in one file.

I added tests and test data to check this feature.

The biggest visible change in the front end was done in respect to show that one concept is present in multiple concept schemes. Because the concept always has the same URI regardless of the concept scheme I'm browsing we needed to display that somehow. This is now done by adding all concept schemes in the header and making the one active bold:

The inScheme information is also rendered on a concepts page.

[sroertgen]

Deployed to test with two test files, one having two schemes in one file, the other having one scheme split in two files. Also there is one concept linked from two concept schemes:

Vocabs: https://test.skohub.io/sroertgen/test-vocabs/heads/main/index.en.html Concept present in two schemes: https://test.skohub.io/sroertgen/test-vocabs/heads/main/w3id.org/two-concepts-one-file/c1.en.html

[sroertgen]

(This is by the way also a test to check if the separation of skohub vocabs und webhook work, since I merged these two branches in the background and thanks to @Phu2 this is already running on the test system)

[sroertgen]

Note to myself: If this is approved, we will merge into main and after that merge branch 217

[acka47]

Nearly everything looks and works fine but I suggest one change regarding the two vocabs in the header:

I think we should only show the main vocab that people are browsing there an only list the other under "In Scheme". Thus, we would have a setup that works the same when the second concept scheme a concept is part of is not published with SkoHub Vocabs or on another SkoHub instance. Or am I missing something?

[sroertgen]

@acka47 But which concept scheme should be chosen when a user directly visits a concept page? always the first found that is also published with skohub vocabs?

[Phu2]

Why should we display the concept scheme(s) in the header? They are present in the details section already. So i would remove them altogether from the header.

[sroertgen]

Yes, Adrian had the same objection.

I fixed it with https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-vocabs/pull/259/commits/92c5c751c42210f15212da4185cd7dac70a810ac

[sroertgen]

@acka47

Please have a look at https://test.skohub.io/sroertgen/test-vocabs/heads/main/w3id.org/two-concepts-one-file/c1.en.html

I fixed the display of concept schemes in the header.