search

skot / bitaxeGamma

Bitaxe based on the BM1370 from the S21 Pro
GNU General Public License v3.0
48 stars 11 forks source link

Wrong display connector #2

Closed marplukiwi closed 1 month ago

marplukiwi commented 2 months ago

The display Connector NPTC041KFXC-RC in the BOM File is wron

marplukiwi commented 2 months ago
Bildschirmfoto 2024-08-27 um 22 12 03
yellowpi commented 1 month ago

The display Connector NPTC041KFXC-RC in the BOM File is wron

And what is the truth? Did you find out?

yellowpi commented 1 month ago

The display Connector NPTC041KFXC-RC in the BOM File is wron

It's the same component used in the 401 Supra. Compatible with the 600 model and the 601 model? I don't understand why you made such a comment. So far, none of the professional sellers who have assembled this project have written a comment on this subject. I would like you to share your experience and evaluation and the solution you have produced with us.

marplukiwi commented 1 month ago

I soldered the display directly to the PCB without a connector. This is also better because the display only has a small distance to the PCB and cannot bend.

yellowpi commented 1 month ago

I soldered the display directly to the PCB without a connector. This is also better because the display only has a small distance to the PCB and cannot bend.

Hello, you can use the screen reinforcement in the link below by printing it from your 3D printer and use it compatible with your screen. with love.

link

https://github.com/IamGPIO/Bitaxe201-204-ScreenSaver

skot commented 1 month ago

Hey, sorry about that. There is no connector needed on the PCB for the display. Get a OLED with male pins and it will friction-fit into the holes on the Bitaxe PCB -- or you can solder them in.

I'll get this fixed on the BOM

yellowpi commented 1 month ago

Hey, sorry about that. There is no connector needed on the PCB for the display. Get a OLED with male pins and it will friction-fit into the holes on the Bitaxe PCB -- or you can solder them in.

I'll get this fixed on the BOM

Mr. skot, is there no need to buy this? Should we buy this component?

skot commented 1 month ago

J3 part number has been removed from schematic and BOM. There is no need for a part on this footprint.