Closed fgiorgetti closed 3 months ago
- is client the right place for this (as opposed to pkg)?
That is a good point. I believe we can move the client/container
into pkg/container
.
- is there a name other than 'compat' that would more clearly indicate what the package is for?
With regards to the client/compat
and the client/generated
packages, I am not intending to modify
them at this point, because we have a target of moving them (as well as the generate-client
Makefile's target)
into a separate repository and keep the skupper repo clean.
But at that point, I will try to structure things appropriately in the new repository.
Does that work or do you have any other thoughts?
Does that work or do you have any other thoughts?
That works, certainly.
This will be used, as a replacement to libpod client implementation, in order to provide a common way to deal with container engine sites in V2.