Closed zero0cool0 closed 1 year ago
The bcrs_velocity
of an observer is their velocity vector with respect to the frame of reference of the Solar System's center of mass. For an observer on a planetary surface, it's the sum of the planet's motion vector with the observatory's motion vector with respect to the planet. Which I think means that all forms of aberration are automatically included?
Thank you for the quick response! Indeed, if bcrs_velocity
does include the angular velocity of an observer on a planetary surface, then diurnal aberration seems accounted for.
Firstly, great software @brandon-rhodes and all contributors, it's really a gem.
Not an issue, but a question, does this software include diurnal aberration when transforming from a local apparent to a topocentric coordinate system as shown in figure 2 of the SOFA cookbook for Earth Attitude?
I should probably mention that my Python skills are pretty limited, but from what I was able to learn from looking at the code is that the call to
add_aberration()
inpositionlib.py
passes thebcrs_velocity
which would suggest annual aberration, but not diurnal aberration?