Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Pushes to the Mercurial repository for Vim are done exclusively by Bram
Moolenaar and no one else. Dr. Charles "Chip" Campbell maintains his plugins
and publishes advance versions on his "astronaut" site, then he sends "stable"
versions to Bram.
A number of runtime files were updated on the Mercurial repository about two
hours before you opened this issue, including some for Dr. Chip's netrw and
syntax/vim.vim plugins. Did you pull them?
Original comment by antoine....@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2012 at 6:46
Thanks for your response Tony.
I wanted the bleeding-edge Zip plugin in order to create a one-line patch
against. I have since emailed the patch to him, and he merged it, yesterday.
In most open-source projects, bleeding-edge code is kept in the source
repository's "trunk" branch, and that more-stable code is in another branch.
It's confusing to outsiders that Vim development works differently. Why _does_
it work differently?
Kind regards,
--Jason
Original comment by jasonspiro4@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2012 at 6:40
I'm not sure. Maybe in part by following what happened before there was a
public distributed source management system. The code on the Mercurial
repository is the code that Bram is ready to make public. At the moment, that
means a "default" branch for the 7.3 code, which is the only branch with
visible "serious" development, and some other ("dead") branches for obsolete
versions. I expect that the repository will fork again when there will be a 7.4
alpha or 8.0 alpha open for public testing. Following what other projects do
and how Mercurial what conceived, a 7.3 branch should be named at that point,
and the default branch should become the new bleeding-edge code. But I don't
know if Bram will see things that way.
Original comment by antoine....@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2012 at 12:27
Since I don't have write access to Mercurial's branch, and since I prefer my
current method, anyway (go to http://www.drchip.org/astronaut/vim/index.html to
find my "bleeding edge" versions of plugins and syntax that I maintain), I
think this issue should be closed.
Original comment by drc...@campbellfamily.biz
on 11 Feb 2013 at 8:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jasonspiro4@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2012 at 9:44