Let the user choose, but the main goal of junk group is tho couple it with "not added to any of the selected groups", to avoid scanning for what was saved to junk before. Saving to junk is not "that" common, from what I've seen most folks just ignore sources they don't care about unless they really show up too often. Currently the annoying part is that there is one "save" button that you have to click on and unselect the "real" groups to save to junk. If we do keep track of junk groups then it can be save / junk, and on select to both you would pick groups to save the candidate to. Keep in mind that the behavior is the same for junk and normal groups. You might scan for multiple groups at once and save candidates to a subset of these, just like you might save to a subset of the selected junk groups.
Truth is folks "hacked" their way around the rejection system by creating these junk groups, that's more a consequence of what felt more practical to them then what this "not added to any of the selected groups" was really intended for.
dj-256
commented
1 week ago
Truth is folks "hacked" their way around the rejection system by creating these junk groups, that's more a consequence of what felt more practical to them then what this "not added to any of the selected groups" was really intended for.
_Originally posted by @Theodlz in https://github.com/skyportal/skyportal-mobile-ionic/pull/14#discussion_r1655639458_