Open fredericpoitevin opened 11 months ago
Adding XSS/XAS/XES wishlist for the liquid standard config I realize that these are not simple requests and may require some discussion about implementation.
Key requirement is robustness, so the automatic smalldata analysis becomes reliable and integrated into the workflow.
What is the best way to set parameters for automatic analysis? any barrier of entry will make it the first thing to suffer in a time-crunch. Automatic/robust parameters that can be overwritten or updated could be a way to go.
%%% parmeter visualizer
[ ]General parameter monitoring, plots, histograms to see how the tracked PV's have changed (advanced archiver )
[ ] Lasertiming: drift monitoring, lxt, txt, lxt_fast , TTfltpos fwhm, TT calib. Timetraces, running averages, 2D plots, histograms with FWHM estimates, "unique" with run grouping of lxt or lxt_fast range
[ ] Laser power: Timetraces, running averages, 2D plots, histograms with FWHM estimates, "unique" with run grouping of LXE, LXE_OPA or diodU.ch0
%%% Overlap scans
[ ] Robust XSS overlap scans when lens_h and lens_v and lxt are ascan/dscan'ed
[ ] multiple runs on one page as we often repeat and try to find reproducibility
[ ] Extend to overlap scans XES/XAS
[ ] Extend to weaker and TT sorted lxt_fast timing overlap scans
[ ] TT calib fit, confidence and output Powertit scans to find onset of nonlinear heating and linear regime.
[ ] XSS onset of nonlinear heating
[ ] linear regimes of XES,XAS,XSS diff signals
%%% Actual analysis for ongoing monitoring of the experiment
Margaret Doyle is super happy with the new smalldata feature in the eLog to look at XE spectrometer alignment and is interested in integrating her whole analysis workflow. I put her wishlist below - one idea could be to create sub-issues from each item when starting to work on it, and close with the corresponding PR.