Closed swampmonster closed 4 years ago
@swampmonster any chance you can test that branch? I don't have access to a mips64 box at the moment.
@swampmonster any chance you can test that branch? I don't have access to a mips64 box at the moment.
I think so. I’ll have a go and get back to you.
Cross compiles fine and does run but errors out on the ubiquiti device i'm trying it on. Looks to be related to something missing in the kernel on the device but i can quite work out what.
INFO[0000] Firewall rule added firewallRule="map[caName: caSha: direction:outgoing endPort:0 groups:[] host:any ip:<nil> proto:0 startPort:0]"
INFO[0000] Firewall rule added firewallRule="map[caName: caSha: direction:incoming endPort:0 groups:[] host:any ip:<nil> proto:1 startPort:0]"
INFO[0000] Firewall rule added firewallRule="map[caName: caSha: direction:incoming endPort:443 groups:[laptop home] host: ip:<nil> proto:6 startPort:443]"
INFO[0000] Firewall started firewallHash=853d3005de969aa0cb1100731e983a740ab4218f89c78189edd389ff5e05ae99
FATA[0000] protocol not available
Turning on debug logging doesn't produce any additional output that could give a hint.
@nbrownus do you think it is related to endinness? A quick glance at the docs seems to indicate ubiquiti gear with mips64 runs as big endian vs little.
@swampmonster I used to own an EdgeMax, but can't find it. Which device are you using? I'll buy one, as I'd love to see nebula run well on these.
endinness
# echo -n I | od -to2 | head -n1 | cut -f2 -d" " | cut -c6 0
Would seem to indicate big endian.
@swampmonster I used to own an EdgeMax, but can't find it. Which device are you using? I'll buy one, as I'd love to see nebula run well on these.
This is on a ubiquiti security gateway, https://www.ui.com/unifi-routing/usg/
Going to see if I can get this working in a VM.
Going to see if I can get this working in a VM.
If I can help out with any testing let me know
@swampmonster can you test this branch again? I got access to a mips64le system and it presented with the same error. Got that bit fixed and nebula is working there, curious if there is more to solve in big endian land.
@swampmonster can you test this branch again? I got access to a mips64le system and it presented with the same error. Got that bit fixed and nebula is working there, curious if there is more to solve in big endian land.
INFO[0000] Firewall rule added firewallRule="map[caName: caSha: direction:outgoing endPort:0 groups:[] host:any ip:<nil> proto:0 startPort:0]"
INFO[0000] Firewall rule added firewallRule="map[caName: caSha: direction:incoming endPort:0 groups:[] host:any ip:<nil> proto:1 startPort:0]"
INFO[0000] Firewall rule added firewallRule="map[caName: caSha: direction:incoming endPort:443 groups:[laptop home] host: ip:<nil> proto:6 startPort:443]"
INFO[0000] Firewall started firewallHash=853d3005de969aa0cb1100731e983a740ab4218f89c78189edd389ff5e05ae99
INFO[0000] Main HostMap created network=192.168.100.1/24 preferredRanges="[]"
INFO[0000] UDP hole punching enabled
FATA[0000] invalid argument
It got a little further now
Just added another few changes, if this doesn't work hopefully Ryans gear shows up soon :)
Just added another few changes, if this doesn't work hopefully Ryans gear shows up soon :)
Errors out in the same place as before sadly (same error message too).
Very helpful, thanks! The error is somewhere in https://github.com/slackhq/nebula/blob/mips64/tun_linux.go#L143
I'll try and read through the code more thoroughly when I get the chance, as well as improve the error messages here.
Just made a quick stab at error message improvement, if you get the chance, another run would be great. Should tell us which part of the activation is failing.
Just made a quick stab at error message improvement, if you get the chance, another run would be great. Should tell us which part of the activation is failing.
FATA[0000] failed to set tun mtu: invalid argument
Got access to a UBNT security gateway, did some very initial testing and the latest version of this branch looks much better.
Got access to a UBNT security gateway, did some very initial testing and the latest version of this branch looks much better.
Can confirm. Builds and seems to run now! Haven't tried actually connecting any clients yet but i'm assuming that should work as well.
This should be working on master now. Thanks for reporting!
Are there any plans on supporting mips64?