Using pr-str on the thing being evaluated gives a more correct answer. I needed to change an existing spec to make this change, but I think that one is also a correction rather than a problem: adds quotes to the should-throw error message for when the Exception message differs. Since that value is a string, it makes sense to have it quoted inside the angle brackets (<"Not my message"> instead of ).
trptcolin
commented
13 years ago
I noticed when trying out speclj that a failing test of mine was showing something like this:
Using).
pr-stron the thing being evaluated gives a more correct answer. I needed to change an existing spec to make this change, but I think that one is also a correction rather than a problem: adds quotes to the should-throw error message for when the Exception message differs. Since that value is a string, it makes sense to have it quoted inside the angle brackets (<"Not my message"> instead ofThoughts?
Colin