Open paich64 opened 3 weeks ago
I have carefully reviewed the VIC2.txt file, and the very first "x" on the list belongs to cycle 63 which has been voluntary duplicated by the author on the left of the document (and cycle 1 has been also voluntary duplicated by the author on the right). Also based on the "phi" signal it's obvious the first "x" belongs to cycle 63 which has been duplicated.
Describe the bug Machine PAL, Bad Line, No sprites. running a program cycle by cycle when on a bad line, it looks like the bad line timings reported by The CPU counters are the following: 12 r/w cycles 3 w only cycles 40 cycles stolen by vic2 (43 if the above 3 w only cycles can't be used by any instruction) 8 r/w cycles
However, according to the vic2.txt doc (https://www.zimmers.net/cbmpics/cbm/c64/vic-ii.txt) the timings should be :
11 r/w cycles 3 w only cycles 40 cycles stolen by vic2 (43 if the above 3 w only cycles can't be used by any instruction) 9 r/w cycles
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior Unless I'm wrong, according to the VIC2.txt doc, there should be 11 r/w cycles (not 12) at the beginning of the badline, and 9 r/w cycles (not 8) at the end of the badline.
Screenshots
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Additional context
rastcolor1.zip