Closed kohlhase closed 2 years ago
Interesting, sometimes I can get rid of errors by adding [name=a]
to the \varseq
The syntax had suggested that this is optional. But sometimes I do not seem to need the names.
Interesting, sometimes I can get rid of errors by adding
[name=a]
to the\varseq
The syntax had suggested that this is optional. But sometimes I do not seem to need the names.
Ah, that explains things - I think if you don't specify a name it will attempt to use the notation as a name, as with \vardef. But of course, in that case the name contains #1
and #2
...
I will take a look after the paper deadline
OK, I would suggest that if we need a name, then we should make the name syntactically required.
...or make the macroname the name, rather. seqp
seems like a reasonable name for a variable to me. I'll need to check the code though, whether that's really what's going on here
same question as in the other context - have you tried [fragile]?
you are richt, fragile seems to cure this.
In
MiKoMH/AI/source/probabilistic-reasoning/mod/wwr-probabilistic.en.tex
I haveand I get errors: