Closed abchugh closed 1 year ago
Also, see hover on Rational Number
in https://stex-active-doc.kwarc.info/browser/%3AsTeX%2Fdocument%3Farchive%3Dsmglom%2Farithmetics%26filepath%3Dpercentage.en.xhtml
Example: When percentage sign is used here, the notations are shown when we click on the concept but the definition is missing.
https://gl.mathhub.info/smglom/arithmetics/-/blob/main/source/mod/percentage.en.tex
This is something we should really investigate, because there is a definition in the sTeX source, I have seen the "missing definition" in quite a few other places, and it is annoying.
This is something we should really investigate, because there is a definition in the sTeX source, I have seen the "missing definition" in quite a few other places, and it is annoying.
The information is missing in the sources: 1. \begin{sdefinition} has no for=
attribute and 2. The definition does not contain any \definame or \definiens. This means sTeX/MMT have no way of determining what this is a definition for.
Ah, very interesting. Then we should have the linter predict them (see https://github.com/slatex/sTeX-IDE/issues/19).
Example: When percentage sign is used here, the notations are shown when we click on the concept but the definition is missing.
https://gl.mathhub.info/smglom/arithmetics/-/blob/main/source/mod/percentage.en.tex