currently, {mcb} and {scb} could use a bit more love in the presentation. In the moment,
\begin{subproblem}
There is a walk from $a$ to $b$ that visits each \sr{node}{vertex} of $G$ ...
\begin{subproblem}
...at most once.
\begin{scb}[style=inline]
\scc[T]{\sn{constant}}
\scc{\sn{linear}, i.e. $\atmost{\natplus{\card\nodes,\card\edges}}$}
\scc{\sn{polynomial}}
\scc{\sn{exponential}}
\end{scb}
\end{subproblem}
[x] there is no space after the circle (even though there is a ~ in the \scc macro; weird.
[ ] The footnotes for the result are wasteful, we should just juse \circledcirc from amssymb.sty for the [T] case of \scc and only have the footnotes if there is feedback via Ttext for Ftext. For the [T] case of \mcc we could use something like \makebox[0pt][l]{$\square$}\raisebox{.15ex}{\hspace{0.1em}$\checkmark$}
currently,
{mcb}
and{scb}
could use a bit more love in the presentation. In the moment,(from
MathHub/problems/maai-test/source/logic/prob/graph-complexities-lutz.en.tex
giveswith
below.
There are a couple of problems:
~
in the\scc
macro; weird.\circledcirc
fromamssymb.sty
for the[T]
case of\scc
and only have the footnotes if there is feedback viaTtext
forFtext
. For the[T]
case of\mcc
we could use something like\makebox[0pt][l]{$\square$}\raisebox{.15ex}{\hspace{0.1em}$\checkmark$}