search

slaylines / bundlers-comparison

Performance and usage comparison of Webpack 4, Parcel and Rollup bundlers.
MIT License
78 stars 2 forks source link

Leaving out tooling alternatives for better DX #3

Open shellscape opened 5 years ago

shellscape commented 5 years ago

Solid benchmark suite, but like so many do, this follows in lock-step with the "official" tooling suite for webpack and leaves out superior alternatives.

webpack-cli webpack-nano webpack-dev-server webpack-plugin-serve

webpack-dev-server is in a constant state of disrepair and doesn't function properly after all this time. webpack-cli is still bloated and mismanaged, even after recent changes, and does far more than the average user (or framework) actually needs.

Just because they're "official" doesn't make them better.

mkalygin commented 5 years ago

@shellscape I wasn't aware of these alternatives, thanks for the info. I'm not sure I'm good at these tools enough to add them in the comparison. Do you want to jump in?

Please refer to this comment https://github.com/tehcookies/bundlers-comparison/pull/1#issuecomment-458726692. It provides the idea on how you can add more setups for the bundlers. Simply speaking just add another couple of tasks to the "scripts" section in package.json. PRs are welcome!

shellscape commented 5 years ago

Thanks, I'll have a look.