Open DrLex0 opened 8 years ago
I suspect that if you had a terminal window open for debug message it'd be complaining about not being able to complete loops.
Unable to close this loop having 20 points
Something is definitely up with the handling of the file, and whatever it is isn't checked during the manifold checking.
According to Slic3r's preview, it is making a double-thick layer at 4.3.0, and it's weird in other ways.
It would be nice if slicing errors, or even just a warning icon, would show up somewhere in the interface, so users could know it wouldn't be a good idea to just start printing.
I usually remove redundant edges resulting from boolean operations, but this time I had been lazy. Apparently it is good hygiene after all…
Errors like that show up in the console (stdout), probably because that's coming from libslic3r as a printf statement and isn't redirected to somewhere the GUI can understand it.
Probably worth a refactor.
It is worth looking into the Cura code for slicing the STL. I have a feeling its automatic repair works better, or maybe it will just give the user a chance to try an alternate strategy.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Joseph Lenox notifications@github.com wrote:
Errors like that show up in the console (stdout), probably because that's coming from libslic3r as a printf statement and isn't redirected to somewhere the GUI can understand it.
Probably worth a refactor.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/3491#issuecomment-248371466, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFj5I5MGCMJX9seAnbC-PcVwtHit8ifjks5qsBdIgaJpZM4J0Vq_ .
Version
1.2.9 Also tested it in the 1.30.0.25 prusa3d fork, same behavior.
Operating system type + version
Mac OS X 10.11.6
Behavior
Slice the attached STL file (which is manifold) with attached settings. The entire layer at Z position 4.10 is missing. My curious self would like to see what happens if I print this, but my sane self tells me it will be a waste of time and perfectly good ABS.
Also attached is a modified STL that no longer exhibits the problem, the only thing I changed is dissolve some of the edges in the surface at the 4.10 mm Z position.
STL/Config (.ZIP) where problem occurs
IssueFiles.zip