Open Omkar0114 opened 1 year ago
Hey @kcq are the proposed changes right? If yes then can I go ahead with this - https://github.com/slimtoolkit/slim/blob/master/pkg/docker/dockerfile/dockerfile.go#L19
https://github.com/slimtoolkit/slim/blob/master/pkg/docker/dockerfile/reverse/reverse.go#L107
Hi @kcq sorry for pinging you again, can you please review this PR and point out me how to go ahead with this? Thanks!
HI @kcq, @iximiuz can anyone comment on this PR or review my PR?
@CodiumAI-Agent /review
๐ฏ Main theme: Refactor Docker instruction handling
๐ Type of PR: Refactoring
๐งช Relevant tests added: No
โจ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused as it is clearly aimed at refactoring the Docker instruction handling code, and all changes are related to this goal.
๐ Security concerns: No, the changes made in this PR do not introduce any apparent security concerns. The changes are related to internal code refactoring and do not involve any security-sensitive operations.
๐ก General PR suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are clear. However, it would be beneficial to add tests to verify the new implementation. Also, it would be helpful to include in the PR description why this refactoring was necessary, and what benefits it brings.
Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
@CodiumAI-Agent /describe
Preparing pr description...
@CodiumAI-Agent /improve
Hi @kcq can I improve the code with the above suggestions?
@CodiumAI-Agent /review
๐ฏ Main theme: Refactoring Docker instruction handling in the code
๐ Type of PR: Refactoring
โจ Focused PR: True
๐ Security concerns: No security concerns found
General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on a single task of refactoring Docker instruction handling. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that verify the new implementation.
๐ค Code feedback:
relevant file: pkg/docker/instruction/instruction.go
suggestion: The map DOCKER_INSTRUCTION_NAMES should have its keys in lower case to match the usage in the IsKnown function. [important]
relevant line: var DOCKER_INSTRUCTION_NAMES map[string]bool = map[string]bool{
relevant file: pkg/docker/instruction/instruction.go
suggestion: The SupportsJSONForm function should return a list of instruction names that support JSON form, not all instruction names. [important]
relevant line: return DOCKER_INSTRUCTION_NAMES
relevant file: pkg/docker/instruction/instruction.go
suggestion: The IsKnown function should return the boolean value directly, instead of separating it into two lines. [medium]
relevant line: _, ok := DOCKER_INSTRUCTION_NAMES[name]
Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.
Hi @kcq When this PR will merge I updated the code with all your suggestions.
Fixes #374
Refactored the code to use one set of Docker instructions. Right now modified the code in the - https://github.com/slimtoolkit/slim/blob/master/pkg/docker/instruction/instruction.go