Structure of State Machine incompatible with Tables?

[markusvoelter]

In mbeddr's state machines, the transitions live under a state (under the state they "leave"). As a consequence, the subsitute info thingy does not really work, because I don't have a way of specifying the collection in which the new element will live.

In the screenshot below, the "contents" slot is the collection of state machine contents. I am not sure if the table API can be changed to accomodate this structure, or whether we have to change mbeddr's state machines.

Let's talk.

[slisson]

You can now directly specify the concept. The idea of specifying the "child path" was to automatically instantiate the required "wrappers", but that is not implemented yet.