Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
A lot of people have asked for some sort of "tagging" of methods to be excluded
and I
believe this is very similar in spirit to Issue 9. However, I don't think
private
methods should be excluded as a blanket option. If you have private methods
that are
not getting called by your testing, doesn't that mean that one's testing is not
exercising the public methods sufficiently?
Original comment by joseph.b...@gmail.com
on 22 Apr 2009 at 2:36
I agree concerning the private methods. But some sort of tagging would really be
fine, for example to exclude methods which are defined in a custom namespace so
they
aren't accessable to the end user or as i already mentioned for methods which
will be
removed / changed soon and don't need to be covered.
Original comment by tgue...@adobe.com
on 22 Apr 2009 at 3:14
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tgue...@adobe.com
on 22 Apr 2009 at 11:24