search

slucky31 / mycomicsmanager

MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

fix(deps): update dependency sonaranalyzer.csharp to v9.28.0.94264 (main) #613

Closed renovate[bot] closed 4 months ago

renovate[bot] commented 4 months ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
SonarAnalyzer.CSharp (source) 9.27.0.93347 -> 9.28.0.94264 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

SonarSource/sonar-dotnet (SonarAnalyzer.CSharp) ### [`v9.28.0.94264`](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/releases/tag/9.28.0.94264): 9.28 [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/compare/9.27.0.93347...9.28.0.94264) ##### False Positive - [9432](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/9432) - \[C#] Fix S1144 FP: Unused fields in class with StructLayout when struct is in deep hierarchy class - [9379](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/9379) - \[C#] Fix S1144 FP: Diagnostic doesn't respect reflection with `DynamicallyAccessedMembers` attribute - [8342](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/8342) - \[C#] Fix S1144 FP: Private Attributes - [7068](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/7068) - \[C#] Fix S4144 FP: when type constraints are used - [3050](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/3050) - \[C#] Fix S1479 FP: Single line case clause should be ignored - [9447](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/9447) - \[C#] Fix S1854 FP: Value used in `catch` or `when` should LiveIn for all try blocks - [9440](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/9440) - \[C#] Fix S1854 FP: Value used in finally should LiveIn for all try blocks - [4948](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/4948) - \[C#] Fix S1854 FP: Value used in finally should LiveIn after throw - [6894](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/6894) - \[C#, VB.NET] Fix S3878 FP: When non-object array is passed to object\[] params as first argument - [6893](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/6893) - \[C#, VB.NET] Fix S3878 FP: when a params argument is named ##### False Negative - [8719](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/8719) - \[C#, VB.NET] Fix S2583/S2589 FN: try-catch in loop, LVA purges symbol prematurely - [4940](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/4940) - \[C#] Fix S1854 FN: Proper support of try/catch statements - [1255](https://togithub.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/1255) - \[C#] Fix S1871 FN: Support single line conditional block

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codacy-production[bot] commented 4 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for cf07f92994047adeab69d88b00a9b993682d3366[^1] :white_check_mark: ∅ (target: 80.00%)
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (cf07f92994047adeab69d88b00a9b993682d3366) | Report Missing | Report Missing | Report Missing | | | Head commit (2a1345312bdded3b1b52f58d5165158831316db8) | 1748 | 1633 | 93.42% | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#613) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more [^1]: Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.