Closed hbellur closed 4 years ago
Yep, that's fair. We can remove that.
@dopey where does it say that https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8555#section-7.3.5 is optional?
@dcow we don't support it through the ACME api. So we shouldn't be returning it as part of the directory response. Not a question of whether it's optional.
Is that conventional (I don't have tons of experience with ACME clients)? If we remove the key change url do clients know how to proceed? Or will we just get a new issue opened up with whatever error message someone sees when they try to do a key change but the url is not in the directory? Do we have an issue tracking support for § 7.3.5? I agree it's probably better not to list the path if we know we'll just 404 on it if that's our only option. But I wonder, is there perhaps an alternate http status code like "501
not implemented" we could return that more directly informs clients about what's happening?
Subject of the issue
Describe your issue here.
Directory object returns key change URL. But server returns 404 when attempting to perform key rollover
Your environment