This is the start of a PR to move from using JOIN ... ON to the JOIN ... USING, which only requires to name the columns on which to join.
Though, while I do like the idea of getting rid of columns just named id, I don't like that the JOIN clauses don't make it explicit which tables are actually joined. While this makes things somewhat redundant, it also allows one to read an SQL query in isolation and see which tables are linked together.
So, this PR is mostly for archival.
I'll close it without merging. (It's also still incomplete).
This is the start of a PR to move from using JOIN ... ON to the JOIN ... USING, which only requires to name the columns on which to join.
Though, while I do like the idea of getting rid of columns just named
id
, I don't like that the JOIN clauses don't make it explicit which tables are actually joined. While this makes things somewhat redundant, it also allows one to read an SQL query in isolation and see which tables are linked together.So, this PR is mostly for archival. I'll close it without merging. (It's also still incomplete).