Closed mikix closed 3 months ago
This is not widely useful, but could be helpful for some fancy post-processing a researcher might do
👋 Hi, researcher here this IS widely useful :) Came here to request this exact feature. Additional columns of interest are which annotator (chart-reviewer) and the text selected
Ideal case: note_id, annotator_id, label, mention
Can you talk more about the use case where you wanted this?
Adding mention text and annotators is a bit above and beyond the use case we had hit originally, where we really just wanted the ability to unify "note/label" data -- specifically, to format Label Studio labels as if they were an external annotation set with two columns of docref_id,label
.
So there might be two different use cases here and I want to be sure we don't build the wrong thing.
Andy mentioned this request on slack, which might be feature-related or not, depending:
Summarize frequency of annotation at different scale/resolutions.
10, Headache
andy, Headache, 5
amy, Headache, 5
andy, Headache, H/A, 1
andy, Headache, Headache, 4
It has occasionally happened that an export of the labels in Label Studio would be helpful, ala an "external" set of CSV annotations.
Something like:
chart-review export-ls-labels <annotator>
And you get a CSV of
note_id,label
for that annotator, like an external annotation.This is not widely useful, but could be helpful for some fancy post-processing a researcher might do. I think the last time it came up for BCH was when we were playing with comparing some LLM results against human annotations. Just recording this idea here, so we have a place to track the request.
(This issue is split off from #26)