As long as it is aligned with SCRF's goals, virtually anyone is free to submit a request to start a research summary idea. But can our processes support that? Do our systems encourage that? Are we doing it fast enough?
The idea proposal stage currently sits as a our entrance to welcome research summary idea. This is an ongoing project to improve the call and dig into the potential of our content pipeline.
Previously we developed Call for Summaries to highlight summaries with higher priority. This improvement project will also start from there.
Work Plan
Steps to be determined. A few idea to start:
Previously these opportunities are "filled" and summary writers "admitted". We want to explore languages that make as opposed to "pitched" and "signed-off" which better reflects our expectations on summary writers/researchers.
Coordinating with #206 to decide which papers goes to the call for summaries.
Project Description
As long as it is aligned with SCRF's goals, virtually anyone is free to submit a request to start a research summary idea. But can our processes support that? Do our systems encourage that? Are we doing it fast enough?
The idea proposal stage currently sits as a our entrance to welcome research summary idea. This is an ongoing project to improve the call and dig into the potential of our content pipeline.
Previously we developed Call for Summaries to highlight summaries with higher priority. This improvement project will also start from there.
Work Plan
Steps to be determined. A few idea to start:
Resources
Card to Call for Summaries Ongoing Master Page for the Grant FAQ for submissions List of Papers