The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.
More information about the SDL evolution process is available at
Hello SDL community,
The review of "Revise SDL-0261 - New vehicle data WindowStatus proposal - Fix API specification issues" begins now and runs through June 9, 2020.
This will be a review of proposed revisions to a previously accepted but not yet implemented proposal, SDL 0261.
The pull request outlining the revisions under review is available here:
https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/pull/994
Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:
https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/issues/1028
What goes into a review?
The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
More information about the SDL evolution process is available at
https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md
Thank you, Theresa Lech
Program Manager - Livio theresa@livio.io