Open adam3smith opened 9 years ago
Something like that would be very convenient, but I'm not sure how to implement this best. Right now, academicmarkdown doesn't really use unique citekeys. It's more of a search query, which should match exactly one reference. So say that @Doe2014
is a unique reference in one database, it may not be in another database with two 2014 papers by Doe, in which case you'd have to write e.g. Doe2014Journalname
.
So how would that logic fit into the idea of citekeys? And do Zotero references really have unique citekeys?
Hopefully Zotero will eventually get (human-usable) stable citekeys, but that's a different topic. My approach would be to pick something relatively safe to be unique- i.e. including the (short?) title - here. Might still be preferable to many people (especially the less-techy crowd that markup may be able to attract over LaTeX). Allowing basic customization via prefs wouldn't be hard.
This maybe wishful thinking, but since you wrote both: I've long thought that using Qnotero as a substitute for word processor add-on would be really neat: i.e. instead of copying a citation's citekey from Zotero (I realize that's not possible for academicmarkdown yet, but it'd be trivially easy to write a Zotero translator that does that--if you're interested I can do that for you), you'd just select the item in Qnotero, and create the citekey. Is that realistic at all?
edit: ideally, the format of the citekey would be customizable. I'd really like this to also work for our google doc/Scrivener oriented ODF-scan format