Would it be possible to expose the finite difference step size as a keyword argument when setting up a buckling problem? I think this could help resolve the issue of discrepancies between load factors/buckling modes between TACS and commercial codes.
Would it be possible to expose the finite difference step size as a keyword argument when setting up a buckling problem? I think this could help resolve the issue of discrepancies between load factors/buckling modes between TACS and commercial codes.