smeighan / nutcracker

RGB Effects builder for Chistmas Animations
15 stars 15 forks source link

Request-URI Too Large #57

Closed zoobmarine closed 11 years ago

zoobmarine commented 11 years ago

On second page of Single Strand with a 70 pixels I get the following error

Request-URI Too Large The requested URL's length exceeds the capacity limit for this server.

Is using get instead of post and Request URI is more than 255 limit

smeighan commented 11 years ago

i have never seen thsi error.

what user name, target and effect where you using?

thanks

On 1/7/2013 8:04 AM, zoobmarine wrote:

On second page of Single Strand with a 70 pixels I get the following error

Request-URI Too Large The requested URL's length exceeds the capacity limit for this server.

Is using get instead of post and Request URI is more than 255 limit

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/smeighan/nutcracker/issues/57.

zoobmarine commented 11 years ago

username: zoobmarine target: SINGLE effect: single strand

In second page, where you can choose colors

smeighan commented 11 years ago

You single strand model had 70 pixels but you had segments sa zero.

You must divide your pixel pile into segments. To give you an example, i set your 70 pixels into 2 segments, 35 nodes each.

here is what that now looks like

http://nutcracker123.com/nutcracker/effects/workspaces/654/SINGLE~SINGLES1.gif

remember, you must have a non zero segment count.

The idea of single strands was take whatever you have, put it all toegter into one big mega string. Then divide that huge pile into segments.

On 1/7/2013 11:45 AM, zoobmarine wrote:

username: zoobmarine target: SINGLE effect: single strand

In second page, where you can choose colors

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/smeighan/nutcracker/issues/57#issuecomment-11964635.

kgustafson commented 11 years ago

Sean,

we should error check for an entry of segments = 0 (along with a heck of a lot of extra error checks like a blank name for the effect name or target name, etc.)

smeighan commented 11 years ago

Yes, i agree. I am going to close this bug. We need a separate bug to track getting input validation.